Critical analysis of Indian soda lime: scope of Improvement

1 May 2020 / by ARCHANA KUMARI, K.K. K. SINGH, K. K. MISHRA, A. KUMAR, R.K. TIWARY, S.K. SINGH and R.S. SINGH

Soda lime is one of the most popular carbon dioxide absorbent materials to be used for closed-circuit life saving safety breathing apparatus in mining industries. A trained rescue person uses it during a situation such as a
fire, explosion or emission of toxic gasses in underground mines. This paper evaluates the chemical composition and physical properties of soda lime using specific parameters (moisture, carbon dioxide gas absorption, granule shape and fine particle size) which plays an important role in its application in breathing apparatus. Results indicated that soda lime moisture content, fine grains and hardness ranged between 11.6-18.3%, 0.2-1.9g, and 70-90%,
respectively. The CO 2 absorption rate was observed to be 20.0 to 57.0 minutes compared to standard UK Protosorb soda lime CO 2 (135 minutes). X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) and Scanning
Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis of the samples were carried out to understand the changes in molecular structure of the material before and after CO 2 absorption. The XRD result indicated presence of portlandite
(48.5%),calcite (49.6%) and potassium rhenium sulfide telluride cyan acetate (PRSTCA) (1.84%) before CO 2 absorption and calcite calcium carbonate (89.4%) portlandite (3.38%) and octasodium d-potassium tetra hydrogen
dihydroxo tetra telluride dipalladate (7.2%), 20-hydrate was observed after CO 2 absorption. EDS of sample 6 indicated presence of carbon (4.94%), oxygen (39.80%) sodium (3.36%) and calcium (51.90%) before CO 2 absorption and carbon (6.27%), oxygen (36 96%), sodium (1.37%) and calcium (55.40%) after CO 2 absorption.

Keywords: Carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), soda lime, hot air oven, breathing apparatus, XRD, EDS, SEM.

References:
1. Douglas, R. K., Donald, V. T., Jeffry, S. B., O’Neill, H. J. & Gordon, S. M., (1989): Submarine abs atmospheres,
Toxically Letts 49(1989), pp. 243-251
2. Olajire, A.A., (2010): CO 2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications a review, Energy 35(2010),
pp. 2610-2628
3. Hsu H. C. & Chung S. T., (2011): Removal of CO 2 from indoor air by alkanet amine in a rotating packed bed. Sep
Purify Technol, 82 (2011), pp.156-166.
4. Jonathan L.S., David G.K. and Randal J.K., (2009): Occupational hazards of carbon dioxide exposure,J. Chem. Health
Safety 16(2009), pp.18-22.
5. Cable, J., (2008): NIOSH Report Details The Dangers of Carbon Dioxide in Confined Spaces,Available online at:
http://www.occupationalhazards.com /News/ Article/ 37358 (Last access date: 24 December 2009).6. Moore, L.W and Campbell, D.L., (1983): Robert Erastus Wilson. In National Academy of Sciences (Ed.), Biographical
Memoir, National Academy of Sciences, Washington D.C. (1983), pp. 409-433
7. Renato, B., Giuseppe, S. and Marco, M., (2006): Process design and energy requirements for the capture of carbon
dioxide from the air, Chem. Eng. & Process. 45(2006), pp. 1047-1058.
8. Shunji, K, Hiromichi, B. Takasumi, K. and Shigehito, S. (2003): Effect of humidity in the circuit on the CO 2 absorption
capacity of Amsorb and Sodasorb II, J Anaesth, 17(2003), pp-145-146.
9. Klos, R. (2008): Removal of oxidable contaminations contained in the submarine atmosphere, Polish Maritime Res., 3
(2008), pp. 67-69.
10. Mazurek, W. (2005): Submarine atmosphere In Hocking, M.B. & Hocking, D. (Eds.), The Handbook of
Environmental Chemistry: Vol. 4, Part H (Air Quality in Airplane Cabins and Similar Enclosed Spaces), Springer- Verlag
Berlin Heiderberg, Germany, (2005), pp. 351-382.
11. Singh, R.S. and Tripathi, N. (2009). Occupational health and safety in coal mining industry. In Proceedings of Recent
Trends in Design, Development, Testing and Certification of Ex-equipment, organized at CIMFR, Dhanbad, 29-31
October, 359-371

Subscription

Feature Articles